Some food for thought... | | Posted by nicholas at June 30, 2010 | | Tags: 2010 June Philosophical Relationship |
I think I finally understand the meaning of love. Love isn't what people say it is. "Two people who care about eachother more than themselves." That is what I usually hear. But they are wrong. I think it is just a disguise of mankinds primitive nature...
Love for a child? Well your parents would protect you just like any mammal would... very similar.
Love for a wife? Identical to how any mammal would mate...
Cheating? It's human nature to cheat on your spouse. People tend to not give into temptation but the temptation is there... another common traight among mammals.
What else is there... oh ya the female pretty much chooses the male, most people have multiple partners, and the idea of sex itself is common amongst our counterparts.
People use love to seperate us with everything else... but it's the same thing... Kinda gives you a sense that love has no meaning really...
In short no pair of people could truely love eachother. The whole idea with love is perfect, meaningful, destined for all... it's just bullshit.
I guess the only benefit of finding a mate is to get financial benefits. The wife could help double income i suppose... |
|
New Comment
Comments:
|
|
|
There is love - it's an attraction over a long period of time.
nothing to be sad about, afterall we're just human
It is what it is, and whatever, pretty much, you want it to be.
Bonobos have sex for pleasure, by the way, and animals are protective of each other, yes. You're saying it's bad that we are like other animals in some ways? Maybe evolution got it right in species other than our own.
You sound kind of misogynistic. Please don't get "a wife" for the extra income.
New Comment